
List of Sessions and Reports of Tokyo Conference 2008 * The Schedule is subject to change.
August 8, 2008 (Fri)
KEYNOTE Takao Tanase, Chuo Law School
August 9, 2008 (Sat)
KEYNOTE David Hingstman, University of Iowa Session 1: ARGUMENT AND POLITICS Michael Janas, Samford University “Sudan: Genocide Beyond Question” Lin-Lee Lee, National Kaohsiung Normal University “Rhetorical Roles of Four First Ladies in Taiwan, the Republic of China” Kevin Baaske, California State University “Democratizing Campaign Debates: The U.S. Presidential Primary Campaign and the YouTube Debates” Patricia Riley & Thomas Hollihan, University of Southern California “Arguing for Free Trade: The Intersection of Global and Domestic Political Discourse” Session 2: ARGUMENTATION PEDAGOGY I Manfred Kraus, University of Tubingen “Advocating the Fanciful - Opposing the Equitable: Arguing For and Against the Laws of Sophistopolis” Kara Gilbert, Monash University “Cultural Cognizance in Argument Design and Interpretation: Towards Eliminating Cultural Bias in University Teaching and Assessment” Hajime Sawamura & Safia Abbas, Niigata University “Some Recent Developments of the Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation” Masako Suzuki, Keio University “Many Voices, One World" in debating” Session 3: PRAGMA DIALECTICS Leah E. Polcar, Roosmaryn Pilgram, & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, University of Amsterdam “An Empirical Investigation of the Use of Variants of Praeteritio in Argumentative Discussions” Yvon Tonnard, University of Amsterdam “How Presentational Devices Can Be Instrumental in Bypassing Discussion Issues” Jan Albert van Laar, University of Amsterdam “Confrontation and cooperation” Session 4: JAPANESE LANGUAGE PROGRAM 柿田秀樹 Hideki Kakita, 獨協大学 Dokkyo University 「実践、ドクサ、レトリック的主体―ヒューマニズム批判」“A Rhetorical Critique of Humanism in the Rhetorical Scholarship: Praxis, Doxa and Rhetor as the Human Subject” 大塚裕子Hiroko Otsuka, 計量計画研究所 the Institute of Behavioral Sciences, 森本郁代 Ikuyo Morimoto, 関西学院大学 Kwansei Gakuin University, 水上悦雄 Etsuo Mizukami, 国際電気通信基礎技術研究所 Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, 富田英司 Eiji Tomida, 愛媛大学 Ehime University, 鈴木佳奈Kana Suzuki, 国際電気通信基礎技術研究所 Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, 竹内和広Kazuhiro Takeuchi,大阪電気通信大学 Osaka Electro-Communication University, 山内保典Yasunori Yamauchi, 名古屋大学 Nagoya University, 武井紀子Noriko Takei,芝浦工業大学Shibaura Institute of Technology, 岩倉成志 Seiji Iwakura, 芝浦工業大学 Shibaura Institute of Technology, 柏岡秀紀Hidenori Kashioka, 国際電気通信基礎技術研究所 Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, 奥村学 Manabu Okumura,東京工業大学 Tokyo Institute of Technology 「大学教育におけるグループ・ディスカッション授業の設計法および評価法の研究」“Developing an evaluation system for group discussion as a part of designing undergraduate education program” Session 5: THE CASE OF JAPAN Shoko Hayashi Barnes, Gateway Community College “Japanese Argumentation under Conditions of Hierarchy” Takayuki Kato, Seiwa University “A Case Study of the Arguments of Succession Issues of the Imperial Family of Japan” Naoki Kambe, Kanda University of International Studies “The Logic of 'Jiko Sekinin' (Self Responsibility) and 'Proper' Citizenship in Contemporary Japan” Pia Moberg, Lund University “The Scattered Nature of Rhetoric in Japan” Session 6: FALLACIES Kamila Kolpashnikova, the University of Tokyo “On Logical Fallacies” Elena Lisanyuk, St Petersburg State University “Ad hominem in Legal Discourse” Roosmaryn Pilgram & Leah E. Polcar, University of Amsterdam “On the Receiving End of a Fallacy. Dealing with Fallacious Argumentation in Question-Answer Exchanges” Bart Garssen, University of Amsterdam “Seemingly Reasonable Ad Hominem Fallacies and Legitimate Personal Attacks” Session 7: ARGUMENTATION THEORY I Steven F. Rafferty, University of Southern California “Comic Frames and Parrhesiastic Games: Burke and Foucault on the Theory and Practice of Criticism” Natalia Zaitseva, Russian Academy of Foreign Trade “Targeting versus Anonymity: A Phenomenological Issue of Legal Argumentation” Dmitri Zaitsev, Moscow State University “Argumentation Evaluation” Session 8: LEGAL ARGUMENT I David Zarefsky, Northwestern University “Taking the Jurisprudential Metaphor Seriously” Henrike Jansen, Leiden University “Problems in Analyzing Legal Discourse” Martha S. Cheng, Rollins College “The Rule of Law and Incommensurable Arguments: The Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Case” Session 9: DEBATE AND DISCUSSION Carly Woods & Takuzo Konishi, University of Pittsburgh “What Has Been Exchanged: Towards a History of the Japan-US Debate Exchange Tour” Javier Rodriguez Alcazar, University of Granada “Risk Assessment and Public Debate” Session 10: ARGUMENTATION THEORY II Frans van Eemeren, University of Amsterdam “The Need for Well-Considered Normativity in the Study of Argumentation” Harald Wohlrapp, University of Hamburg “The Concept of Substantial Argument” Ivan Mikirtumov, Saint-Petersburg State University “Externalization and Modification of Knowledge: Argumentational Operation and Logical Models” Rachel Avon Whidden, Lake Forest College “When the Personal Becomes Public: Rethinking the Relationship Between Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument” Session 11: ARGUMENT AND WAR Gordon R. Mitchell, University of Pittsburgh & Satoru Aonuma, Kanda University of International Studies “The Diatribe Function of Shareholder Resolutions: Arguments of Last Resort in Public Debate on Japanese Missile Defense” Bernardo Alexander Attias, California State University ? Northridge “Consulting Debra: Conspiracy Argumentation in the War on Terror” Linda Diane Horwitz, Lake Forest College “Does Anyone Really Know What Time It Is?: The Doomsday Clock’s Iconic Life” Tim Doty, Lewis-Clark State College “The USA PATRIOT Act as Condensation Symbol: Debating the Nature of Patriotism in the U.S. House of Representatives” Session 12: LEGAL ARGUMENT II Sergio Novani, University of Urbino and Centre for Legal Philosophy Studies “Laudan and Stella Face Each Other” Katsuya Koresawa & Joseph P. Zompetti, Illinois State University “Japan’s New Criminal Court Trial Proceedings: A Gramscian Perspective on Democratic Philosophy and Praxis” Paul van den Hoven, Utrecht University “Sign Processes in the Law Court and the Functions of Judicial Argumentation in the West” Janice Schuetz, University of New Mexico “Aberrations of Argument and Subversion of Justice in the Trial of Zacarias Moussaoui”
August 10, 2008 (Sun)
Session 13: ARGUMENT AND CULTURE Syed Munir Khasru, Institute of Business Administration, Dhaka University “Debate: The Cross Cultural Perspective” Lin Allen, James A. Keaten, Yen-I Lee, Zachary Huston & Amanda Hammack, University of Northern Colorado “A Deconstruction of Linguistic and Cultural Assumptions in Small v. United States: The Bulb on a String of Holiday Lights” Jaime Lane Wright, St. John's University “Argument in a Simulational Culture” Stephen Llano, St. John’s University, Queens “Argumentative Divestment” Session 14: ARGUMENTATION PEDAGOGY II Bruce W. Davidson & Joseph Luckett, Hokusei Gakuen University “Appraising Critical Thinking and Arguments in EFL Composition” Daisy R. Lemus, California State University -Northridge & David R. Seibold, University of California - Santa Barbara “Argument Development versus Argument Strength: The Predictive Potential of Argument Quality in Computer-Mediated Group Deliberations” Hirofumi Kamada, University of Kyushu “Effects of Academic Debate on Managers of Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan” Mika Nakano, Kyushu University “What Encourages or Discourages Japanese High School Students to Argue?: The Effect of SELHi Discussion Program in Japan” Session 15: ARGUMENTATION THEORY III Lotte van Poppel, University of Amsterdam “The Analysis of Pragmatic Argumentation” Michael Hazen, Wake Forest University, Narahiko Inoue, Kyushu University,　Sayaka Fourcade, Nintendo, and Naho Maruta, Wake Forest University “Argument & Message Contextuality” Christopher V. Langone, Cornell University “Framing, Debate and Justice” Session 16: ARGUMENT AND SOCIETY Eiji Tomida, Ehime University “Application of Social Network Analysis to Measuring Discussion Quality and Contribution by Discussants” Shojiro Yasui, Tokyo Institute of Technology "Conflict between Personal Freedom and Democratic Decision-making." Tetsufumi Takimoto, Kyoto University “The Role of Argumentation in the Board Meeting with Venture Capital Investment” Don Waisanen, University of Southern California & Takeshi Suzuki, Tsuda College “From The Colbert Report to Counterfactual Argument: Reflections on Parodic Public Spheres” Session 17: PHILOSOPHY AND ARGUMENT I Thomas G. Goodnight, University of Southern Californi “Counterfactual Argumentation” Katarzyna Budzynska, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University & Magdalena Kacprzak, Bialystok University of Technology “Aristotle, Rhetoric and Probability” Eric Dunning, University of Alabama “Plato vs. Thrasymachus: Paradigms of Rhetorical Authorization in Defining Justice” Yun Xie, Sun Yat-sen University “Dialectic within Pragma-dialectics and Informal Logic” Session 18: ARGUMENTATION AND HISTORY Hiroko Okuda, Nanzan University “Call for Advocacy from Okinawa” Angela G. Ray, Northwestern University “A Woman Is a Man but Not a Freeman: Gendered Language and Legal Argument in Nineteenth-Century Pennsylvania, USA” Yuko Itatsu, University of Southern California “An Analysis of Leisure Argumentation: Before and After the Great Depression in the U.S.” Kenji Kubo, Soka University “The Argument Movement in Japan” Session 19: ARGUMENT AND IDENTITY Joseph P. Zompetti, Illinois State University & David C. Williams, Florida Atlantic University “The Pedagogy of Civic Engagement” Aya Kubota, Mejiro University “Representation of Humanitarian Action: Cases of the Red Cross and Medecins Sans Frontieres” Jose Julio Leon R., Universidad Diego Portales “Justice, Prejudice and the Basis of a Reasonable Legal Argumentation” Junya Morooka, Kanagawa University “Documenting the Undocumented: A Case of the Special Residence Permission Campaign in 1999 through 2000” Session 20: LEGAL ARGUMENT III Mark T. Lavery, Community Law Center “The Emerging ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution’ Private Justice System in the United States: A challenge for the Traditional ‘Trial Lawyer’” J. Anthony Blair, University of Windsor “Perelman Today on Justice and Argumentation” Brian Lain, University of North Texas “Citizenship and Detention in War on Terror” Session 21: WAR MEMORY Joseph P. Zompetti, Illinois State University & Satoru Aonuma, Kanda University of International Studies “Stasis and the Collective National Memory of Statues: The Soldier Statue Controversy in Tallinn, Estonia” Kaori Yamada, Hosei University “Power of Personal Narratives: A Rhetorical Consideration of Flags Of Our Fathers” Tomohiro Kanke, Tokai University “Redefinition of Emperor Hirohito and the US-Japan relations in the wake of World War II: An analysis of the ‘Hirohito and MacArthur Photograph’” Session 22: ARGUMENT THROUGH AESTHETICS Meryl J. Irwin Carlson, University of Iowa “Agentic Sweat and Ambivalent Tears: Reconstituting the Aesthetic on Reality Television in the U.S.” Jane Munksgaard, University of Iowa “The Visibility of the Performative Argument: Orlan and Grotesque” Jason Regnier, University of Iowa “Aesthetic Politics and the Appropriation of the Rhetoric of Art” Session 23: PHLOOSOPHY AND ARGUMENT II Takuzo Konishi, University of Pittsburgh “The Challenge of Argumentative Meta-Dialogues” Geoff Klinger, DePauw University “Prudence, Law, and Argument: The Debates Between Philosophy and Rhetoric in the History of Jurisprudence” Omri Ceren, University of Southern California “Securing Law: Habermas's Affective Turn” Juho Ritola, University of Turku “Harmless Epistemic Circularity?”
	Go to Top Page

（注）このページに掲載されている情報の著作権はJDAにあります。無断での複製、転載を禁じます。